Human Rights
and Health 2002
A Statement from Global
Lawyers and Physicians for Human Rights
printsavecomment
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was promulgated over
50 years ago, and sets a standard of civilization by which all nations
can be judged and compared. The goals of the human rights movement
are to safeguard the dignity and fundamental rights and freedoms
of everyone. The human rights approach has been a powerful and necessary
tool for improving human conditions by challenging oppressive authorities
who have failed to meet their duties to the people of their countries.
The successful struggles against colonialism and apartheid, the
release of many prisoners of conscience, and the creation a new
understanding, in the context of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, of the inextricable
link between health and human rights, has demonstrated the power
of the human rights movement.
The world places significant value on the human rights and health
movement as evidenced by a growing body of literature and the many
emerging conferences devoted to this topic. However, human rights
and health violations continue despite rapid medical and scientific
advances, even in wealthy, industrialized countries. Economic polarization
has intensified, resulting in widening disparities in health status
and longevity. While a small percentage of the population enjoys
a high quality of life and benefits from continuing scientific progress,
billions of people lack access to even basic health care. It is
essential to take equity seriously and move immediately to improve
the lives of the 2 billion people who live in wretched conditions,
and another 2 billion people with inadequate health care, education,
and nutrition.
The bold promise of universal human rights is more often aspirational
and inspirational than operational. Universal success of the movement
requires a commitment on the part of each nation to move beyond
self-interest and sovereignty as well as an effort to reach beyond
elite, academic circles to involve all people in the solution. Barriers
to reaching this goal must be addressed, including the failure of
powerful nations to acknowledge and document human rights violations
within their borders, insincerity in the application of recognized
standards in their relationships with foreign powers, and complacency
with the notion of human rights as a purely Western endeavor. Critical
to this mission is the understanding that rights are ineffective
if the correlative duties are not carried out. The force of the
human rights approach could be significantly strengthened by integrating
duties and identifying those who bear responsibility for assuring
that they are met. Civil and political rights are necessary components
of political citizenship, but not sufficient, for the respect of
human dignity. Social, economic, and cultural rights are vital to
human rights as well. Political rights are closely linked with economic
rights. Poverty, well established as the root cause of poor health,
cannot be adequately addressed unless all citizens have access to
the political systems and educational opportunities. With this recognition
comes an obligation of wealthier nations to work towards the elevation
of all of these rights. The events of September 11th exponentially
increased the United States' motivation to fight terrorism and deter
future attacks. Although poverty does not directly cause terrorism,
improving the living conditions of those worst off in the world
is likely to prevent the growth of terrorist organizations. We should
recognize the global advantages as well as the moral imperative
of preventing starvation and alleviating preventable suffering.
As illustrated by the World Health Organization's Report on the
Commission on Macroeconomics and Health, debt relief and modest
increments in economic assistance could establish effective international
public health programs and provide access to clean drinking water,
adequate nutrition, basic education, health care, and essential
drugs. The establishment of a Global AIDS, Malaria and TB Fund is
one step towards this goal. Full support from the United States
, financially and conceptually, would demonstrate what can be accomplished
with the wealth of powerful nations and a statement of our commitment
to helping other nations.
It is imperative that wealthy nations both recognize an obligation
to commit resources to less fortunate nations, and recognize the
impact of setting a moral example. For example, it was unacceptable
for the United States to support pharmaceutical companies in their
action against the South African government's plans to import generic
drugs to deal with the devastating human tragedy of HIV/AIDS, yet
threatened to do the same thing itself when this action seemed necessary
to protect the health of the American public by obtaining adequate
supplies of antibiotics after the anthrax attacks. The actions the
United States takes domestically provide powerful examples for other
nations. Neglecting the poor within wealthy societies, perpetuating
unsustainable consumerist lifestyles, failing to provide universal
health care for its citizens, and producing weapons of mass destruction
send powerful messages to other nations that directly conflict with
our acceptance of universal human rights.
As responsible lawyers and physicians working for health and human
rights, we commit ourselves to sustaining the concepts of human
rights and building on the impressive successes achieved thus far.
Through continuing intellectual and practical approaches, we are
resolved to broaden and intensify global concern for human health
and concrete actions to improve the health and living conditions
of all people.
|